Leftarded Fallout | They cannot make up their mind

9 01 2011

With the media circus that has flared up around the issue of certain sections of society preying on defenceless children, the Left do not know where to look.  As Rod Liddle points out…

A bizarre report on the Asian child abuse court case on the BBC last night, which spent most of its time attempting to exonerate the Pakistani community as a whole, including clips of Pakistanis saying “actually, we probably shouldn’t abuse kiddies” and a white child abuse campaigner saying hey, look, it’s not Pakistanis who are the problem, etc etc.

This was broadcasting as a form of crowd control; undiluted propaganda. The fact is that some Pakistani men think it perfectly ok to abuse white girls and there are still gangs out there right now doing so. When Nick Griffin mentioned this fact, many years ago, they tried to prosecute him. When Radio Five covered the story five years ago they were eviscerated for it.

The praise the Left give towards Wikileaks verges on Sainthood, yet God damn those who expose any non-approved fact.  The indignation they display to the public to counter distasteful information stresses the concept of Controlled Media.  All this fallout amongst them shows just how vain and contradictory their ideals are.  And so, they are lashing out at anyone who might try to make political capital out of it, be racist, even the beloved Stooge of Labour, Straw Jack!

Most telling though is the one man you’d think the Controlled Media would be trying to hose down would be Nick Griffin, currently lending a hand to Derek Adams campaign in Oldham.  Instead, we have his views regurgitated, twisted and manipulated by those apologists and appeasers.

A recap of what has so upset the meeja darlings from the spectrum I’ve found are running with; Former home secretary says gangs of Pakistani men see young white girls as ‘easy meat’ (Independent);  Jack Straw, the former home secretary, has sparked a fierce row over his claim that some British Pakistani men regard white girls as “easy meat” for sexual abuse (Telegraph);  Labour MP Vaz says it is wrong for former home secretary to stereotype entire community over sexual assault case (GulfNews)

This is where I despair at all the criminologists.  The majority of crime victims, no matter what the crime, be it robbery or rape, are usually chosen for their perceived weakness and wrongs.  And the ones doing the choosing are by a large, opportunistic degenerates whose only resemblance to bravery happens when in a gang (or getting the Police or Armed Services to do it).

However, with rape and other sexual offences, it doesn’t help if the Koran advocates treating non-believers as fair-game.  Nor does if help with the constant promoted degradation of women by the Satanic Gods in the Meeja Industry (From Hollywood to Fleet Street).

It would be wrong to isolate this as an immigrant problem, yet the biggest immigration problem is that whenever they have a problem, it’ll be oppressive to point it out.

See where I’m going.  The problem is POLITICAL CORRECTNESS in a MULTICULTURAL environment.

They keep going around and around in circles asking is this the result of one thing when it is a combination of many aided by Cultural Marxism disguised as Political Correctness.

(((Click image to enlarge)))

Never forget what Harriet supports!

Never forget what Hodge was head of!

The enemy is not outside the gates no more.  They were imported here by the Enemy to divide us, making it easier to destroy Our Heritage and replace it with a New World Perversion.

Just say NO!

Advertisements




Blighted UK | Probably not far from the truth

27 06 2010

Although highly inflated and most definitely sprinkled with a dash Hollywood spice comes the following quote from the bastion of British sensationalism, gleaned from a well-directed moan at Her Majesty’s Services.

“I’m a senior planning officer: it’s my job to inspect buildings, grant planning approval and to guide members of the public looking to alter their homes.

Our department has 60 employees and  –  until last Tuesday  –  a budget of £22million.

I’ve been there for two years and in that period the only time I’ve ever seen every employee present and correct was at the Christmas party.

At least ten people will be off sick on any one day. The departmental record holder is Doreen  –  she has worked a grand total of eight days in 14 months.

Doreen must be the unluckiest woman in the country.

In the past year and a half she claims she has: fallen victim to frostbite; been hit by a car; and accidentally set herself on fire.

But she’s really pulled out all the stops with her latest excuse: witchcraft. That’s right, Doreen believes somebody in Nigeria has cast a spell on her and that it would be unprofessional of her to attempt to do the job she is paid £56k a year for while under the influence of the spell.

She has already been off for four months on full pay. I’ve no idea how long this spell lasts, but my guessing would be six months to the day  –  the exact amount of time council employees can take off on full pay before their money is reduced.

But having just eight weeks of full pay left won’t be a problem for Doreen and the rest of the council’s sickly staff  –  they’ll simply return to work when the six months is up, put in a day or two’s work and then go off sick for another six months on full pay again. Easy.

Of course they have to provide sick-notes from a doctor, but as you can buy fake ones online for £10 it’s never proved a problem.

There are procedures in place to address attendance, but nobody ever follows them through  –  chances are the person whose job it is to monitor sickness is probably signed off himself.

Some human resources managers, usually new to the job, do try to take action  –  but it mostly backfires.

All credit to the bright-eyed young HR manager who, last year, wanted to dismiss a senior employee who had been off sick for three months.

The employee had still been using his company mobile phone, from Marbella.

However, the employee was able (with a little help from the mighty Unison union) to argue that there’s no reason why ‘sick’ people can’t rent villas in the Costa Del Sol.

I’ve been told by colleagues that I don’t take enough sick leave  –  when I protest that it is because I’m in good health they look confused. What’s that got to do with anything?

At my borough a worker can take two weeks before having to produce a doctor’s note (fake or not).

With the five weeks’ annual leave plus bank holidays, even the most conscientious worker in my department is easily taking 12 weeks a year off.

To add insult to injury, some London boroughs recently introduced a new scheme whereby anybody who did an extra 15 minutes’ work a day for 20 days could take an extra day’s holiday.

But when you can so easily take six months off, who needs official holidays?

Back to the day’s business. Jerry is the next to arrive at 10.25am  –  before he takes his jacket off he performs his morning ritual of taking both his phones off the hook.

God forbid that any resident and council tax payer should be able to speak to him and get some of the advice he’s paid £64k a year to dispense.

Jerry is 63 and two years from retirement. He is what is known in the civil service and local government as an ‘untouchable’  –  he’s been at the council for more than 40 years, does no work, but would cost an absolute fortune to get rid of.

So he’s left alone to play online poker, Skype his daughter in Florida and take his two-hour daily snooze at his desk, no doubt dreaming of the day when his gold-plated public sector pension will kick in.”

As the title suggests, it wouldn’t surprise me if this half a gram of truth in it.





S**t-stirring Media | We’re all evil afterall

4 06 2010

No matter how much sensationalist or unpatriotic the bullcrap the Daily Wail produces, I will not evacuate their online version due to the fact that out of all the online news-polluters, I find the DM’s layout much more preferable than the rest.

Auntie Beeb gives you a choice of five other stories along with a dozen old ones about the one you just read.

Sky News is all funny blocks with the entire emphasis on video with a couple of paragraphs that takes 3 seconds to read which explains fully what the 3 minute clip intended.

The Telegraph is a funny old thing, even on the internet it is cumbersome to read, although I must admit, taught me a dozen fancy words, some even foreign!

And the guardian is so leftarded, every other story is about a gay lettuce.  Can’t be suffering that and usually only grace their pages if directed.

What I find special about the Daily Wail is the wide scope of stories highlighted.  If there is even a sprinkle of controversy involved, you can be sure as the nose on your face that the Murdoch News Wire will inform their sub-outlets of the s**t-stirring golddust found.  You could bet your whole damn face that the Daily Wail will pick it up, especially if most of the legwork has already been done.

Take the “Black man shot dead and his body dragged for ten miles in shocking U.S. killing” which was promoted in the sidebar simply as ‘White man arrested after black man is shot dead and then his body dragged for 10 miles‘.  Happened across the pond in America and yeah, it sure is a horrendous crime, but surely we have had enough bloodshed closer to home than what some British families who once holiday’d in South Carolina.

Of course, everyone knows that the Daily Wail calls anybody who is against immigration a ‘racist, fascist right-winger’ yet hardly any restraint is shown in their own propagation of “Immigrant on the run after murdering Belgian judge and legal assistant in courthouse in row over housing benefit“.

Anyone would think the Press want civil unrest the way they treat the news, using every opportunity to either praise or pour scorn upon the peoples.  In the end, another self-serving industry that needs news to survive, even if it is embeliished beyond belief.  Wouldn’t be much profit if things went right all the time, and a tool as powerful as mass media, well, no corporate giant would want to close down their biggest money-grabber.

And if the only solution is to transfer the Professional Hacks to the gossip columns, is that really a price worth paying?  Bad enough with the amount of Jordan now, couldn’t stomach anymore.  Although more of Kelly Brook wouldn’t go a miss, always had a thing for that little lady.  Still remember how she helped me up in the mornings when appearing on Channel 4’s Big Breakfast show.





World | Corporate Media Manipulation

26 05 2010

We have 24hrs of constant gossip regarding the sex lives of charlatans and scoundrels pumped through the main stream media not just to entertain (although how anyone can be entertained by Piers Morgan I don’t know) but to divert our attention, shape our opinions and pervert our morals. Yet what matters most to us is distorted or hidden between who’s slept with whom, how much so and so is on and the fake furore over the soon-to-be Mrs Cole (call me!).

Our media institutions are hand in hand with our True Political Masters.  Without the need of a real beating, everything can be played out before our eyes by whip, just the constant promotion of a certain stereo-type to harmonise the herd.

Everything we hold dear; Family, friends, community and nation. All to be sacrificed for the benefit of the few powerful oligarchs whose only desire is to corporatize the world.

Nationalism is a prime example of how the Corporate Media twists the motives behind such movements.  With the constant barrage of how Nationalism causes wars, starvation and inequality while hiding the fact that it is Internationalism that profits from such things.

It is the Multi-National Corporations that make the weapons, transport the food and promote financial inequality. Another example is the copious amount of sex on TV today in programmes such as Eastenders, the constant exchanging of partners and the degradation they bestow on traditional families. These programmes are watched by millions (many who are kids) who then go about to copy their idols.

Sport, once the prime pastime of the masses has also been corporatized making it no more a battle of strength and skill but a corporate battle over a market share for fans, merchandise and players. Just look at our own FA who are more interested in making money from advertisers by playing Beckham than getting a team together capable of winning a tournament. All the while advertisers pay mega money to convince us we need the new mach 5, another loan or a nice holiday in the sun.

Our very own Government blew £540m a couple of years’ back on advertisements from telling us to watch our intake of salt to the gentle reminders from Martha Stewart to return our tax returns.  Thankfully I have avoided the mention of the last media budget, I know it’s bad so no need confirming it.

We’re well on our way to a Brave New World at this rate, a world not for people but for soulless Corporations. Time to turn off, tune in and cop-out of the Corporate World and to try to attain personal independence as best we can. We have a lot of work ahead of us to break free from the media matrix of misinformation but freedom is rarely free, just never knew it’d be such so tedious.

Argh!!!  What the heck is wrong with this world, everything is upside-down.





UK Ummah | Muslim Parliament of Britain

1 05 2010

Not only are our Political Masters adept at shooting themselves in both feet, the Media Hacks that fuel their propaganda also seem to have their fair share of fools.  Problem with old boy networks is the fact that your thick as two planks’ nephew is guaranteed a job somewhere in the hierarchy.

Article in question was sent to me by a fellow patriot, for why would I read the local Manchester news, the music is crap and the football mundane.  Okay, I’m just jealous cos I live in Little Lagos.  Back to the task at hand  though and the Media are once again stirring the brownstuff, this time with the Scribes from the Manchester Evening News doing their level best to sling some blame onto the evil white-wingers.

Probe after ‘race-hate’ leaflets sent to homes

Neal Keeling, MEN.  April 30, 2010

Police are investigating after a shocking leaflet – falsely claiming to be from a Muslim organisation – was delivered to homes in a bid to stir up racial tensions.

The letter, which glorifies the deaths of British soldiers, was delivered to about 50 addresses in Goulden Street and Pembroke Street in Seedley, Salford.

The leaflets arrived via Royal Mail and the first sheet purported to be from The Muslim Parliament Of Great Britain. But a spokesman for the organisation strongly denied it had anything to do with it.

One line of inquiry is that the letter was distributed by right-wing activists to cause trouble.

The letter criticises some white police officers for ‘ingratiating’ themselves with black people and says that diversity is good for Britain ‘as long as ethnic people are in the majority’. It adds: ‘Bear in mind the vast majority of UK soldiers being killed in Afghanistan are white. This will eventually reduce the UK of white men.”

Goulden Street resident Lynn Pringle-Hadley received the letter and took it to police.

She said: “I was horrified. I attended the funeral in Irlam of a soldier killed in Afghanistan and when I read this letter I found it deeply shocking.

“This has left a lot of people in our street very angry. It is dangerous because it could provoke a reaction against the Muslim community.”

Dr Ghayas Siddiqui, secretary of the The Muslim Parliament Of Great Britain, said: “Nothing of this kind has ever been sent out on behalf of our organisation.

“Some people are desperate to cause trouble and try to create conflict. The content of this letter is shocking.” He said that the person who was supposed to have signed it was not a member of the organisation.

Coun John Warmisham, who represents the area, said: “I am absolutely appalled that someone could stoop so low as to try and raise racial tension in Salford, particularly in my ward of Langworthy, where there are strong community groups working together.

“This sort of scaremongering is gutter politics of the lowest.”

The scaremongering is done by the paper and the article.  A small incident that could have been limited to the area has now become a source for speculation, with the NUJ infested ranks of this News Polluter choosing to blame the invisible right-wingers.

Must be the Manchester sect of the Ku Klux Klan who want to start Islamic snatch and grab lynchings and segregate the UK with separate Parliaments and Laws.  Just because we haven’t found them, doesn’t mean they don’t meet up in the Manchester underbelly holding rallies and performing lynchings.  Or course, these are the most considerate, quietest and tidiest Klan members in the world.  They leave no evidence of their misdeeds, not one Celtic Cross banner confiscated, no gatherings disrupted and the Police haven’t found a burnt out cadaver of an unfortunate victim yet.

Reason given is that Muslims would never resort to such inflammatory acts.  They would never hold up placards at Our Boys’ homecomings calling them ‘murderers’ would they.  They would never post hate-mail to grieving relatives of Our Allies’ Fallen, would they.  They would never insult Our Wounded, Our Aged and Our Youth, would they.

Those that ‘police’ the Religion of Peace said so.  To counter the Islamphobic reactions to such vile acts, the Leftards parade the two-man operation of Aryan Strike Force as a deadly threat.  Apologies to all but anyone seeking to pop the Establishment one in the eye isn’t a threat to me personally, I fear the lunatic armies of doom the Establishment have imported more than some nutter with a grudge against Parliament.

Glad to see the Community Cohesion and Integrated Society proudly exhibited includes the ever so inclusive Muslim Parliament.  I would love the choice of my own English Parliament too instead of the corrupted one I currently suffer under but hey, I’m not special.

The Muslim Parliament of Britain.

From Wiki

History in a sentence:

The Muslim Parliament of Great Britain is a Muslim organization founded in 1992 in London by Dr Kalim Siddiqui, Director of the Muslim Institute, based on a proposal published in July 1990 under the title The Muslim Manifesto. The Muslim Parliament consists mainly of appointees, including women and young people, and works through specialist committees. Its proposals have attracted public attention and some have been copied by other Muslim groups. Following Kalim Siddiqui’s passing in 1996, the Muslim Parliament’s leadership passed to Dr Siddiqui’s right-hand man, Dr Ghayasuddin Siddiqui (no relation).

Muslim Manifesto same source:

The ideas in the The Muslim Manifesto: A Strategy for Survival[2] launched the Muslim Parliament. Authored primarily by Kalim Siddiqui, the Manifesto declared:

“It is a matter of deep regret that the Government, all political parties and the mass media in Britain are now engaged in a relentless campaign to reduce Muslim citizens of this country to the status of a disparaged and oppressed minority. We have no alternative but to resist this insidious campaign.”

The Muslim Manifesto made it clear that “Political and cultural subservience goes against their grain” because “at its inception Islam created a political platform from which Muslims were to launch themselves on a global role as founders of great states, empires and a world civilization and culture.”

The Muslim Manifesto proposes setting up a “Council of Muslim Women in Britain”, stating that “It is for Muslim women themselves to develop an Islamic lifestyle in the context of the needs of the Muslim community in Britain. It is also for Muslim women to play a major part in the public life of the Muslim community in Britain… The fact is that a Muslim woman cannot be a western woman… Muslim women have a higher and nobler place in society than the so-called “emancipated” women in the west”.

The Manifesto establishes a six-point “Relationship with the British authorities”:

  • Islam allows Muslims to accept protection of life, property, and liberty from non-Muslim rulers and their political systems. Muslims placed in this situation may also pay taxes and other dues to a non-Muslim State.
  • Muslims living under the protection of a non-Muslim State must obey the laws of that State, so long as such obedience does not conflict with their commitment to Islam and the Ummah. Other minorities in Britain, notably Jews and Roman Catholics, do the same.
  • There are laws on the British Statute Book that are in direct conflict with the laws of Allah; these relate to such matters as usury, abortion, homosexuality, gambling, sale and consumption of alcohol, and the abolition of capital punishment; Muslims can neither agree with nor condone any part of a legal and social agenda which so flagrantly violates the laws of nature as well as of God.
  • Muslims will co-operate with the appropriate authorities for the maintenance of law and order and the promotion of peaceful and wholesome conditions for all our fellow citizens.
  • Muslims will insist, and continue to insist for as long as it may be necessary, that the British State provide them, their religion and culture protection from gratuitous insult, obscenity and abuse.
  • Muslims make it clear to the State, and to all sections of British society, that they do not expect to be and will not tolerate being insulted and abused on grounds of their religion, culture and traditions.

Whoah!  Segregation, sedition and separate parliaments seems to be the ideal this Muslim Parliament seek.

Some of my fellow patriots voted for that.  Hope it was worth it.





BNP | Mr Griffin on Radio 4

1 05 2010

Kudos to Saint Nick, England’s version of Santa Claus for once more out-maneuvering the Establishment and the associated masses of deluded filtered through.  A lesser Patriot would have fluffed his answers but not the BNP’s main character.

Love him or hate him, you can now see why the Anti-Democratic Media Complex denied the Nationalist a platform.

Kuods to BNPChannel2 for the uploads.

Vote Nationalist.

It’s in the name.





Guardian | Nudging the Deluded

30 04 2010

I must be allergic to the Guardian brand of leftarded media waffle, for although three sheets to the wind right not (pissed), I am still shaking with rage.

Never in the history of the written word has so much humanitarian brotherly bullcrap ever been published.  Even Karl Marx himself would find it hard competing with these ideological fools.  For it is easy to observe and report, much harder to work and provide.

Reason for the spillage of poisonous venom is the fact that I cannot find Iron Man 2, am real drowsy due to drink and have just read the following Idiot’s Guide to Voting provided in the nausea inducing leftist rag of Earth Plc’s International Caring and Sharing Gangmasters, so long as it is the Masters who get to ‘care’ while the gang have to ‘share’.

More voter dilemmas: can you help?

‘I was going to vote Tory again but don’t like my local candidate’

‘My heart says Lib Dem but it is a wasted vote’

‘How should I vote to keep the BNP out?’

These people have contacted us about their voting quandaries. Can you help? We’re particularly keen to hear from people with local knowledge of the constituencies in question. We’ve numbered them so you can indicate in the thread which voter you particularly want to help.

Voter 1

I am a (relatively) new voter, with only one general election behind me I thought I was quite happy to keep voting Conservative. However, I don’t like the candidate standing in my local area of Lincoln, Karl McCartney. I’ve had dealings with the current MP Gillian Merron (Labour) and despite her carefully arranged PR handshakes and photo opportunities, I like what the former Blair’s Babe has done for the area. With half decent roads and train lines now in place I believe her promise to deliver more. The Tory candidate just can’t compete in the publicity battles, he puts his foot in things and is lacking in charisma. My dilemma is: do I vote for the party I like, or the person I want in power in my area?

Voter 2

I have just moved to Glasgow South, considered a safe Labour seat. The Labour candidate is a decent enough chap, but my heart tells me to vote Lib Dem as I feel it is time for change in Westminster and I am very tired of the two “main” parties being the only choice we ever have due to a flawed and outdated voting system. If I vote Lib Dem, am I wasting my vote? According to the voterpower.org.uk website my vote here is only worth 0.04 (6.25 times less than the UK average). The last thing I want is a Tory government, should I just give in and vote Labour?

Voter 3

My constituency is Stoke-on-Trent Central. The sitting MP (Mark Fisher) has retired, and the Labour party has parachuted in someone from outside at the last minute (TV historian Tristram Hunt). What’s more, there’s the threat of the BNP and a popular local ex-BNP member now standing as an independent. As a committed Labour voter, do I go with the Labour candidate, or with the local ex-Labour man who’s now standing as an independent, or with the Lib Dem candidate to force a change, or vote to keep the BNP out?

Nothing about policies, local, national or european, all about Party Colours.  And of course, the main colour being Red.  kvlx387’s comment either sarcastically sends up the ‘questions’ or, gulp, actual advice.

Voter 1: If you think your local Labour MP is so great, why would you vote for another candidate?

Voter 2: You’re in the right constituency to cast a truly tribal vote. Vote Labour. Because you’re from a ‘Labour family’.

Voter 3: You’re another tribal voter. Hence you should vote Labour. That’s what members of your tribe have always done.

That’s another three votes to Labour.

We doomed so long as some of our compatriots (includes NuBritons for we’re all on the same ship now) continue to accept the views of the Establishment Political Media Complex.  Blind loyalty to proven liars, thieves and scoundrels is not progress by any means.

Our problems will not be solved by the cause.

Follow your head this election, not your tribal instincts and definitely not the media.