The Establishment | Told ya so

18 05 2010

The only reason the ‘orrible British National Party was kept out of the running was due to the Establishment colluding and conniving, pooling all resources into a well-oiled machine simply to keep the Nationalists out.

The Wicked Witch of Peckham, Harriet Harperson, on her first speech in Parliament as acting Labour Leader of the ‘Official’ Opposition confirms the unity of the Establishment:

“We all have our differences in this House but all of us are united in being very, very, pleased and relieved that there is nowhere on these green benches a member of the British National Party.”

Not bothered about losing the election, less fussed about the ConDem Coalition, just once again, implying that the elected Parliamentarians only job is to keep the Nationalists at bay.

Put simply, the State have openly encouraged and directed outright hatred towards anyone who opposed their social engineering agenda to such an extent, that the Lie has become Big enough to be believed.

Twenty million deluded turkeys voted for this shitefest.  Twenty poxy million!

With a stat like that, how can any sane Englishman, Welshman, Scotsman, Irishman, in fact, anyone on this planet with half a brain cell have hope in the future?

20,000,000 plus voted for thieves, cheats, liars, murderers, fraudsters, perverts and pimps.

Advertisements




World | Leftarded Armies of Doom

11 05 2010

“Progressive Politics” will be a term we’ll be hearing a lot more if Labour and the Liberals team up.  But what is it exactly?  Simply put, the Progressives seek to social engineer everything we hold dear at the political level.  Of course, we get the government we deserve and the more people produced that can’t tie their shoelaces together, the more we will suffer at the hands of fools.

As my grasp of the English language is failing me due to the heavy workload along with the headache of worrying about Labour-Liberal degenerates coming out holding hands, an article sent to me from a compatriot worthy of reading from the fine Brussels Journal.

Can We Coexist With The Left?

Brussels Journal.  From the desk of Fjordman on Sun, 2010-05-09 08:59

The American writer Lawrence Auster had a debate with his readers regarding the possibility of splitting the USA along ideological lines. According to reader Tim W, modern Left liberalism is a universal totalitarian ideology, not a “live and let live” concept. The goal of its adherents is a world government from which no one can escape. Leftists “need conservatives but conservatives don’t need leftists. To be blunt, they can’t let us go. We’d be happy to be rid of them, because to us they’re nothing but parasites and/or oppressors. But they can’t get rid of us because we do most of the work, pay most of the taxes, provide the stability and morality that allow their depravity to thrive with less damaging results. Furthermore, the white conservative population is the buffer protecting white liberals from the minorities.”

A number of commentators questioned the viability of such a political division. Muslims believe not only that Islam is the best religion, but that it is the only true religion and that all people must be brought into its fold. Likewise, Leftists sincerely believe that Leftism is the only valid ideology, and that the whole world must be brought under its heel. Just like the very existence of self-governed communities outside of Islamic rule is considered an intolerable act of aggression by devout Muslims, so the existence of self-governed non-Leftist communities anywhere, at least if they happen to be white, is unacceptable to Leftist True Believers. They don’t just want to rule themselves; they want to rule everybody else as well.

Good arguments were presented in favor of secession, but opponents point out that attempted partition would likely trigger coercion and force when the ruling oligarchs fear losing control. If the Left sees everything it has promoted for generations about to be overturned it might resort to violence. Above all, opponents questioned whether the whole idea of “just wanting to be left alone” is defeatist and leaves the opponents with the initiative. Perhaps the battle cannot be won until we go on the offensive and take the ideological war to the enemy.

As reality is now, whites are considered potential extremists merely for existing, whereas the most revolting non-white organizations imaginable go free. For example, groups affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood, which has the stated goal of destroying Western civilization, are labeled “moderates,” whereas whites who want an immigration policy that prevents such people from settling in their countries are demonized as “racist extremists” by the media.

As Lawrence Auster says, white Leftists show “absolute moral disgust and horror against white non-liberals for their (almost always falsely imagined) discriminatory attitudes toward nonwhites. The only two moral actors in this script are the white liberals, who are good, and the white non-liberals, who are evil. The nonwhites are not moral actors in the script. They are the passive, sacred objects around whom the moral drama between good whites and evil whites is played out.”

In April 2010, the former left-wing US President Bill Clinton warned commentators to tone down their anti-government rhetoric for fear of inflaming hate groups, as polls suggested that public trust in the US government was at its lowest point for half a century. Clinton tried to conflate the anti-tax Tea Party movement with the 1995 Oklahoma City terrorist bombing, and implicitly voiced support for limiting certain forms of speech that might challenge the left-wing ruling regime. In an interview with The New York Times newspaper, Mr. Clinton was worried about the fact that “Because of the Internet, there is this vast echo chamber and our advocacy reaches into corners that never would have been possible before.” He warned against those who were too negative regarding the policies of Leftist politicians.

In 2009, the same Bill Clinton said that Americans should be mindful of their nation’s changing demographics, which led to the 2008 election of Obama as president. He told an Arab-American audience that by 2050 the U.S. will no longer have a majority of people with a European heritage and stated that “this is a very positive thing.” This was merely eight years after Arab Muslim terrorists staged the deadliest attack against the US mainland in peacetime, killing thousands of US citizens. Yet a dramatic increase in the number of Arab Muslims in his country does not worry Mr. Clinton at all. The only “terrorism” he is concerned about might be protests from people of European origins who oppose their own dispossession.

Bertha Lewis, the chief executive officer of the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now or ACORN, spoke in March 2010 before the Young Democratic Socialists conference. There she predicted a USA headed toward violence that will “dwarf the internments during World War II.” Curiously, this statement was hardly reported in the mass media. She said that immigration is a big battle. “And the reason this is so important is, you know, here’s the secret: (whispering) We’re getting ready to be a majority, minority country. Shhhh. We’ll be like South Africa. More black people than white people. Don’t tell anybody.”

Lewis encouraged people, based solely on the color of their skin, to “get yourselves together, get strong, get big, and get into this battle,” the battle here just defined as the dispossession of whites. She’s the head of an organization that’s been a good friend of the current President Barack Hussein Obama. ACORN was a political issue in the 2008 United States Presidential Election over allegations of voter registration fraud. As President, Obama has repeatedly insulted staunch friends and allies of his country while openly siding with its Islamic enemies.

In April 2010 US President Obama, with unusual frankness regarding his anti-white coalition, appealed to “young people, African-Americans, Latinos, and women who powered our victory in 2008 [to] stand together once again” for continued “change,” essentially the manifestation of an intifada on European Americans. Notice that his message was essentially the same as that of the radical Bertha Lewis of ACORN, only slightly less openly militant. A few days later, the same Mr. Obama with astounding hypocrisy in an address urged both sides in the political debate to tone down their rhetoric. This because using phrases like “Socialists” in his view “closes the door to the possibility of compromise” and “can send signals to the most extreme elements of our society that perhaps violence is a justifiable response.”

The problem is that extremist left-wing elements have received tacit approval for carrying out violence and intimidation for years. This trend is escalating because of thugs such as the Antifa groups in Western Europe. These Leftist vandals get away with what they do because they know they have the quiet backing of the media and the political elites. Also in 2010, the University of Ottawa in Canada cancelled a speech by the U.S. conservative writer Ann Coulter because organizers feared left-wing protesters would turn violent. The American Renaissance conference that same year met with extreme harassment, including death threats. Yet as AR leader Jared Taylor lamented, the story received virtually no coverage from the mainstream Western media, nor from Democratic Presidents Obama or Clinton. The question here is not whether you agree with the people at American Renaissance, the question is why a legal, white political organization cannot meet peacefully when Communists or organizations affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood can do so.

In her book A God Who Hates, the Syrian-born ex-Muslim Wafa Sultan comments on the Islamic “culture of shouting and raiding.” She states that “My experience has been that two Muslims cannot talk together without their conversation turning into shouts within minutes, especially when they disagree with each other, and no good can come of that. When you talk to a Muslim, rationally, in a low calm voice, he has trouble understanding your point of view. He thinks you have lost the argument. A Muslim conversing with anyone else – Muslim or non-Muslim – cannot remember a single word the other person has said, any more than my mother could remember a single word of what the preacher in our local mosque said.”

Former Muslim Ali Sina notes that “there is very little difference between the Left and Islam. What is lacking in both these creeds is the adherence to the Golden Rule. Just as for Muslims, everything Islamic is a priori right and good and everything un-Islamic is a priori wrong and evil, for the Left, everything leftist is a priori oppressed and good.” Facts don’t matter. Lying about opponents and their intentions is so widespread “that it is considered to be normal.”

After it was revealed that much of the data regarding alleged man-made global warming was deliberately fabricated, which constitutes one of the largest and most expensive anti-scientific frauds in history, most of its Leftist backers continued as if nothing had happened. The fact that they had promoted outright lies and slimed their opponents based on these lies mattered little. They believe they had the right to do so, as long as their intentions were right. Muslims, too, are allowed to lie to further the spread of their ideology. This strategy is called taqiyya.

Just like Muslims, both national Socialists and international Socialists totally lack respect for Socratic Dialogue, the reasoned search for truth which has been a hallmark of Western culture at its best. This is why such a large percentage of Western converts to Islam are either neo-Nazis or Marxists: These groups already think a great deal like Muslims. Their creed is the Absolute Truth, which should rule the world and must be imposed on others by brute force if necessary. They consequently have no need for reasoned debate. Others should submit to their rule or be violently squashed. End of story. People of European origins who stick to their cultural heritage constitute the embodiment of evil for Leftists, just like the infidels do for Muslims. Since white Westerners invented capitalism, some radical Socialists apparently believe that a “Final Solution” to the Capitalist Problem involves the annihilation of whites.

Terms such as “ethnic cleansing” should not be used lightly, but the writer Paul Weston is unfortunately correct here: What is happening with the native population throughout Western Europe is a state-sponsored campaign of ethnic cleansing. The only thing that’s unique about Britain is that Andrew Neather from the ruling Labour Party admitted this openly, in writing.

NATO, led by the USA, bombed the Serbs for “ethnic cleansing” back in 1999, thereby facilitating the Islamic ethnic cleansing of Christians in the Balkans. So, if the Western Multicultural oligarchs are against ethnic cleansing, I guess they must now bomb Britain, where the authorities have publicly admitted that they are deliberately displacing the native white population of their country. So why isn’t that happening? Could it be because very similar anti-white policies are currently followed in all Western nations without exception?

Let me add that I don’t think all Leftists have a well-thought-out plan to destroy the West. I have some in my immediate family, and they don’t think like this at all. They sincerely believe that what they are doing is the right thing. The hardcore ones who deliberately want to kill the West might be a minority, but at the end of the day this distinction matters little.

In many cases you can compromise, but in others you cannot. If somebody tries to poison you then you have to resist. It doesn’t matter in the long run whether those who do this do so because they deliberately want to kill you or because they are fools who accidentally kill you while intending to do something noble. The bottom line is: You die. You cannot be slightly dead, just like you cannot be slightly pregnant. If the Leftists and the Globalists have their way then our civilization will die, plain and simple. That’s why this ongoing struggle is likely to get ugly, because no compromise is possible. Since similar ideological struggles are taking place throughout the Western world, this situation could trigger a pan-Western Civil War.

the Left’s obsession with mass immigration and multiculturalism is complex, some who have the best intentions for those concerned but with an equal measure of those with ulterior motives.  The more division is society, the more need for leftarded social engineering plans to ‘cultivate and celebrate’ the transformation for NuBritons rather than highlighting the ‘displacement and disfranchisement’ suffered by TruBritons.  That is the end (desired?) result, the call for more governmental interventionalistic policies.  And to suppress dissenting voices, both subjects are dangled in front of their opponents in the vain hope that the argument can be closed down with accusations of bigotry.

For a lucky few, the benefits of immigration was the extra competition in the job market caused wages to deflate and rents to increase.  The burden of accepting those lower wages and higher rents was placed on the many but we live in a globalised world, where survival of the cheapest has replaced survival of the fittest.

Oh how I despise the Leftarded Armies of Doom.

“When there is no enemy within, the enemies outside cannot hurt you.”  Thanks to the Leftarded Deluded of Great Britain, the enemy are not only within, they are at this very moment, deciding who will rule us.





UK | The Good (Analysis), the Bad (Result) and the Ugly (Conclusion)

8 05 2010

History of UK Plc government

1945, we had Labour. 1951, Conservative. 1964, tiring of the ‘Same Old Tories’, hand the wheel back to Labour. 1970 and the new decade called for a new government, again Conservative. 1974, scratching their collective heads, the British flock back to Labour. 1979, the year of my brother’s birth saw the electorate return to Conservative control. 1997, and we were bamboozled by NuLabour.

The electorate wanted change.  Some change.

At least it is a hung parliament, the more bickering they do in the Houses of Swine, the less chance of them doing something stupid.

Although, going by the last announcements, the Political Mandarins are discussing Britain’s future behind closed doors without so much as a nod to the electorate.

Gordon Brown is making a resilient last stand (and probably selling the rest of the nations’ assets) and a form of bouquet tennis between Clegg and Cameron once more confirms that the Houses of Swine couldn’t organise a piss-up in a brewery.

The Good

We now have a hung parliament meaning in twelve months or less, we shall be heading to the polls again.  That or the final touches are applied to the One Party EU State.  But that’d be an act of war.

Closer to home, even though the British National Party didn’t make the political quake as publicised, they did however  increase their own vote share by 1.2% with the only ones topping that being the Conservatives.  The Nationalists also battled in more wards this time round with 563,743 souls opting for BNP, that divided by 338 candidates equals 1667.87 votes per ward.

the Bad

26,13,8,943 of our compatriots still have faith in the Status Quo, you know, the Establishment that for the last seventy years have steered us into every iceberg floating.  88.1% of the electorate voted for the continual Eunification of the British Isles.  88.1% of the electorate voted for the continual occupation of Afghanistan.  88.1% of the electorate voted for the continual thievery, corruption and lies.  88.1% of the electorate voted for the continual erosion of our individual liberties.  88.1% of the electorate voted for the continual State-sanctioned discrimination against whitey.  88.1% of the electorate voted for the continual globalisation.

No wonder so many TruBritons now deem themselves expatriates.  We are surrounded by the unseeing and unceasing deluded armies of drones incapable of thinking ‘outside the box’.  Can even understand how our less-knowledgable ancestors used to burn witches.

the Ugly

Mutterings from fellow bloggers have suggested that in times of uncertainty, people like to rely on the familiar and it does sound plausible.  My own thoughts are more sinister.  Like Newton stated that his own findings resulted on previous scholars breakthroughs, the same applies to powermongers.

Tyrants standing on the shoulders of past tyrants.

Over hundreds of years the magnates of power have directed, swayed and coerced the public mood using events (pre-planned or otherwise) and propaganda (news-polluting) and even education (indoctrination).  Bread and Circuses is the term for the Entertainment Wing while Police State suffices for the security end of operations.  And with the aid of technology, psychology and chemistry, the majority can be controlled with less, or as we say in the business world, more efficiently and at half the cost.

Add to that thirty odd years of deliberately gerrymandering a dependable electorate utilizing social engineering, mass immigration and accompanied by the constant promotion of a divisive multiculturalist society.  No mention of the extra interventional government that is bound to be needed to keep the peace between such a vibrant and diverse society.

Sadly, the chickens are coming home to roost for many boroughs and I doubt that Proportional Representation will solve it.  For too long we have been programmed and guided by those who know better.  Like captive birds, we are kept in our cages in a variety of ways, be it educational, economical, social, or just that I feel such a damn attachment to Blighty.

Mindless Musing

Our Government positions itself as an International Corporation.  Fact is, Corporations have no soul or conscience, only shareholders.  And if you’re not a shareholder, you’re either stock or a cost.  The only intention of Government is to Govern and the more dependents, the more need for robbing Peter to pay Paul.  Like some mad crack addict, the Government are only ever interested in issuing new Passports.  More transactions means more work and the more work, the more opportunities to have a go on the money-go-round.

Gods.  Mad.  Funeral Pyre.

Just thankful that it rains often in Blighty otherwise it would have kicked off years ago.





Camberwell and Peckham | The Good (Analysis), the Bad (Result) and the Ugly (Conclusion)

7 05 2010

Seeing all those Labour dependents last night voting sank my heart.  People who do not work, should not be allowed vote.  People who were born in another country, should not be allowed vote.  People who cannot spell Britain, should not be allowed vote.

In fact, I would say that the electorate should have to pay a nominal fee to vote.  Not some outrageous amount but something like £2.50 – and for three reasons.  First to make sure that those taking part are willing to put their money where there mouth is.  The second, it would discourage organised voter fraud due to extra cost.  Lastly, it would need the presence of the Police on site due to financial concerns that would also deter fraud, intimidation and any other act that offends democracy.

Enough of the raving.  A reminder of the rotten boroughs of Camberwell and Peckham with the help of UKPollingReport:

Boundary changes: Previously undersized, Camberwell and Peckham gains parts of Faraday and Livesey wards from Southwark North and Bermondsey and South Camberwell and parts of Peckham Rye and The Lane wards from Dulwich and West Norwood.

Profile: Covers Peckham, Peckham Rye, Camberwell and Nunhead. This is one of the most poverty striken and deprived constituencies in the country. It has the highest proportion of afro-carribean residents of any constituency in the country and the highest proportion of social housing of any seat, with almost 6 in 10 homes rented from the council or a housing association.

Only Fools and Horses was never actually filmed in Peckham, but it continues to be the public`s perception of Peckham, and its reputation for desperate crime ridden sink estates was, in the past at least, not inaccurate. This is where Damilola Taylor was murdered in 2000 and, while the worst of the concrete estates (including the North Peckham Estate where Damilola Taylor died) have been demolished in recent years as part of massive regeneration projects, with more planned in coming years, the area continues to suffer from problems of high crime and gang violence.

This is one of Labour`s safest seats in the South of England and, while there is some gentrification in South Peckham, and pockets of Conservative support in the large Georgian houses in places like Camberwell Grove, there is presently no possibility of that dominance being challenged.

And it never hurst to remind all of the ethnicity in my borough according to the 2001 census:

  • Black African – 35.67%
  • White British – 25.73%
  • Black Caribbean – 15.45%
  • Other White – 4.58%
  • Other Black – 3.58%
  • Chinese – 3.51%
  • Other Asian – 2.14%
  • White Irish – 1.93%
  • Mixed White-Black Caribbean – 1.86%
  • Bangladeshi – 1.25%
  • Other Mixed – 1.17%
  • Mixed White-Black African – 1.08%
  • Indian – 0.69%
  • Other South Asian – 0.68%
  • Mixed White-South Asian – 0.35%
  • Pakistani – 0.33%

This year’s result is as follows:

Harriet Harman (Labour) – 27,619

Columba Blango (Lib Dem) – 10,432

Andy Stranack (Con) – 6,080

Jenny Jones (Green) – 1,361

Yohara Robby (Eng Dem) – 435

Joshua Ogunleye (WRP) – 211

Margaret Sharkey (SLP) – 184

Decima Francis (Ind) – 93

Steve Robbins (Ind) – 87

Patricia Knox (Ind) – 82

Jill Mountford (AWL) – 75

Maj: 17,187

Turnout: 59.3%

The conclusion is:

Seeing as the total votes for the lunatic socialists equaled that of the English Democrat, can only say that the once proud area of Southwark has a boil on it’s arse.  In other words:

If that is the plan, Peckham is doomed to become a shanty town so I’m outta here.

My family should have packed up years ago and left this rotten borough to the gerrymandering council, whose policy of pack em in and pack em high has meant tensions were bound to happen, no matter what the colour or creed.  Place has gone down hill ever since the Beeb based ‘Only Fools’ here.  I’m convinced the Beeboids gave that show to Nairobi TV to further encourage the Voodlisation of my beloved Peckham.

Thing is, I wouldn’t have minded the cultural enrichment if there was an overall economical benefit attached, but there wasn’t.  It has only been cost, cost and more cost, be it a financial burden or the accompanying social crap.  The only benefit I have seen are the ones picked up by the State’s dependents.

And we’re supposed to be thankful for the vibrant multicultural community that has replaced what was once English.  How is this multinational grouping of opposing teams suppose to work?





NuSpeak | Diversity

5 05 2010

The joys of a diverse multi-faithculturalracecreedsexuallyambiguous community.  Must be the reason that house prices shoot up wherever the NuBrtions go.  I know rents do.  Yet with so many people wanting so many different things, we can all surely hold hands and skip along the promenade singing songs of comradeship achieving all we desire.

If only life was as simple as the deluded who believe that Establishment bullcrap.  In plain English for all the Leftards that make-up anti-Fascists and anti-Racists, who claim to want world peace and unity though a workers’ cooperative or failing that, some form of Mad Max world where anarchy is king:

Diversity simply aids the Divide and Rule policy that you leftards proclaim to be protesting against.

Do you honestly believe that the British Establishment brought in the masses for any other reason than self-benefit?  Do you honestly believe the presence of umpteen different cultural norms and fashions is the way to have a united peoples?

Take a gander at London’s diversity and ask yourself, where did all those native Britons go.  Then ask yourself, if the native Briton’s own leaders can displace them without so much as a second thought, why would NuBritons fare any better.





UK GE10 | No solution forthcoming

1 05 2010

We know the problem that mass immigration causes, it is the solution the deluded are waiting for.  For decades the public mood has been fed by the Media Mandarins and sadly, many are still waiting for a ‘trusted’ face to stand up and say the obvious.

So long as we remain under political jurisdiction of the Soviet-style European Union, we will always be seen as the dumping ground for the world’s humanity. The people make the country.  Change the people, change the country.

Saw the following and thought it would be worth highlighting.  It is people like YOU who vote BNP.  If there is no shame in supporting an International Socialist Organisation such as Labour or the staunch Corporatist Conservatives, there should be no shame in supporting the British National Party this election.  I still think it is shameful to vote Liberal Democrats though, a party full of sexual deviants and perverted policies should never be encouraged.

The great disconnect: After the economy, immigration is the issue that worries voters most. So why won’t our politicians even discuss it?

By Harriet Sergeant, Daily Mail.  Last updated at 11:21 AM on 1st May 2010

Ridiculous!’ spat Gordon Brown at Gillian Duffy’s comments on immigration in what he thought was the privacy of his car. So what is the truth? How great is the gulf between what politicians say and what really concerns the majority of people?

Having spent the past few weeks speaking to countless ordinary people, I can report that the gulf is very great indeed – something I call The Great Disconnect – and that, after the economy, immigration is THE issue that worries people most.

The People

This is not some random theory. It’s based on the experiences of real people. People like Dave, who I recently met in a cafe in Hastings, East Sussex.

Dave is 22, with cropped hair and a diamond stud in one ear. He yearns for a ‘decent job’ and a home for his girlfriend and baby daughter. Like over half of young white males from a poor background, Dave has trouble with reading. It means he is only qualified for a menial job.

Thirty years ago, he would have still got work in a factory, married his girlfriend, raised a family and contributed to society. Now, those factory jobs no longer exist and menial jobs are monopolised by skilled and hard-working Poles who have not suffered the handicap of a British state education.

This means that Dave, like one in five of young people, cannot get on that first step of the employment ladder.

He explains: ‘When the council advertised two dustmen jobs, there were 100 applications.’

The local job agencies told him he had no chance because he was English. They only took Poles on to their books. When Dave finally did manage to secure a job, he encountered another problem facing young people – our welfare system hands out more in benefits than can be earned on the minimum wage.

The Centre for Social Justice has pointed out that welfare claimants are no better off – and sometimes poorer – if they come off the dole and take up jobs paying anything less than £15,000 a year.

But who is going to offer Dave that kind of money? That’s why the financial adviser at Dave’s Job Centre actually told him not to take the job he had been offered.

‘I would have been £30 worse off,’ he says.

Dave described his despair at the prospect of a life on benefits. ‘I know men of 40 doing nothing but drink and drugs all day. I don’t blame them.’ He shook his head angrily. ‘I don’t want to be beat like that.’

Dave’s situation is far from unique. There are currently 5.9million people of working age claiming out-of-work benefits – costing £74.4billion a year in welfare payments.

The life of this young man has not been wrecked by disadvantage – but by government policy on immigration, education and welfare.

Nor does it end there. Because of immigration, the lack of jobs for the likes of Dave has a direct impact on the rising numbers of single mothers and thus the increase in child poverty – another burden for the taxpayer.

New research by Geoff Dench for the Centre For Policy Studies (CPS) describes the change in single motherhood.

Thirty years ago, a typical single mother was on her own because she had separated from her partner. Now, more than half say they have never lived with a man. And, once more, male joblessness – to which mass immigration has contributed – is at the heart of the issue.

‘I would love to get married,’ a single mother in Brixton told me during my own research.

‘But all the men I know are in prison or deal drugs. I don’t know one man with a job.’

Instead, she has married the State – she’s one of the millions dependant on welfare. The statistics tell their own story: 72 per cent of children of single mothers grow up in poverty.

Children of single mothers are more likely to run away from home, have behavioural problems, do less well at school, take to drugs and get involved in – and society picks up the bill.

This is why the electorate is right to be exercised by these issues.

They understand better than our political elite the relationship between immigration, male joblessness, child poverty and an exploding benefit bill.

It is only in this context that the full, devastating toll of the Labour government’s immigration policy is exposed. Instead of getting young men like Dave into work, the Government has done the opposite.

Under Labour, immigration has risen dramatically. In 2007, more than half a million migrants arrived in this country – more than one a minute.

According to the Office for National Statistics, of the 1.7 million new jobs created since 1997, 81 per cent have gone to foreign workers. These are extraordinary figures.

Behind them lie wrecked lives and a continuing cycle of disadvantage and child poverty.

As one exasperated man asked: ‘Why are we not training our young people to be as skilled and educated as the immigrants now taking their place?’ What a transformation to society if we did.

Why, then, is none of our political parties offering radical solutions? The answer is, they are fearful of being branded ‘bigots’ – just like Gillian Duffy recently was.

Yet the immigration crisis has nothing to do with class, colour or religious background. During one week of my research, a white chef, a black manicurist and an Iranian minicab driver all voiced fears to me about the new influx of immigrants.

Racism is so last century

What they fear is not so much the foreignness of these incomers, but his or her rights to share their welfare benefits – because they know that they are a limited resource.

They cannot – or rather, should not – be for everybody. After a year working in this country, certain EU migrants qualify for the full range of benefits enjoyed by a UK citizen.

Which is why an unemployed Pole explained to me that he is hardly likely to return home if he finds himself out of work. Not when benefits in Poland are half what they are in Britain.

Politicians treat the welfare state as if it is an elastic band, able to stretch to fit all newcomers. They have not appreciated a fact understood by the ordinary voter: this elastic band has a painful twang.

The Cost of Enrichment

One person’s gain is another’s loss. And this loss is being felt right across Britain’s overstretched public services.

For example, one school I visited used to boast an excellent initiative for its white working-class boys – the lowest achieving group in the country. The boys responded enthusiastically.

Even so, the scheme had to be scrapped. The number of immigrant children arriving in that school had shot up in two years from 0 per cent to 10 per cent of the school population.

Money and time spent on those local boys now had to go on language lessons for the new arrivals. Nor is this a unique case. The Cross Party Group on Balanced Migration has found that councils around the country are struggling to cope with a surge of applications to primary schools ‘as a direct result of mass immigration’.

Local authorities in parts of London, the West Midlands and south-west England were forced to install mobile classrooms and educate children in church halls last year because of the shortage of space.

One caller to a recent radio phone-in described the choice facing her daughter in their West London catchment area – one school where one-third of the pupils are refugees, one school where up to a quarter have learning difficulties and one school where Arabic is the first language.

There is an excellent Church of England school, but that is monopolised by middle-class families.

International Health Service

Then, there is the effect immigration has had on the NHS. Of course emergency treatment should be available to anyone in this country. But immigration has placed an intolerable pressure on healthcare.

First, it is the sheer numbers of people who have become entitled to treatment – not only those on work permits and student visas of more than six months, but their dependents, too.

Anyone – ranging from a grandmother, parent or spouse – that an immigrant student or worker can support is entitled to free healthcare. To make matters worse, a large number of immigrants come from countries where TB, hepatitis B and HIV are endemic.

They are contagious, life-threatening diseases. HIV and hepatitis B require expensive treatment for life.

A shocking 70 per cent of all cases of TB occur in immigrants, at an estimated cost to the NHS of £42million a year. And 95 per cent of all new cases of hepatitis B in this country came from abroad.

HIV, too, has become a disease that is affecting one part of the community far more than others.

As one doctor in a sexual health clinic remarked, ’95 per cent of our patients are now heterosexual and from Africa’.

Faced with this unprecedented demand on resources, doctors complained in a report to Parliament that all patients were waiting ‘unacceptably long’.

Yet the NHS makes little attempt to check if people are entitled to free healthcare, as I discovered when I spent a morning sitting with the A&E receptionist of an inner-city hospital.

Receptionists are supposed to ask every new patient if they have lived in the UK for more than 12 months. But few I witnessed bothered.

One official, whose job it is to try to recoup payment from those not entitled to free care, admitted: ‘Half of my receptionists feel uncomfortable asking where a patient has come from.’ I told him: ‘I bet, though, that they wouldn’t feel awkward standing at Gatwick Airport, for example, and handing £1,000 to every foreign visitor?’ ‘No, they would not!’

An A&E manager pointed out: ‘Relatives of families already living here fly over and use their uncle or cousin’s address to gain free NHS care. Some with chronic conditions come backwards and forwards on six-month visas for treatment. The abuse is blatant.’

A second A&E manager explained the consequences: ‘At the same time as so much money is being spent on treating foreigners, I can’t afford to take on more nurses or even an extra porter because there is not enough in the kitty. It’s a can of worms that no one wants to deal with.’

Indeed it is. But the problems caused by immigration do not stop with its effect on employment, schooling and healthcare.

Social Housing

Social housing is another area of tension. Like welfare payments, social housing is a scarce resource. The number of council homes has actually decreased from 4.4 million to 3.9million in the past ten years.

Over the same period, immigration has added three million to the population. Yet the Government has made no provision for this increase. The result is predictable. The waiting list for social housing has shot up in the six years to 2008 by 80 per cent.

By 2011, an estimated two million will be waiting for a council home. According to the pressure group MigrationWatch, the proportion of foreign-born people in social housing has increased by 54 per cent.

This is because qualification for social housing is based on need – and this is often judged by the size of families. Families with more children get higher priority – regardless of how long they’ve lived in the community. According to the Office for National Statistics, women born in Pakistan and now living in the UK have an average of 4.7 children.

Ethnic cleansing

Mothers born in the UK have on average just 1.6. This is the reason why social housing appears to favour recent immigrants. What all this has done to communities is clear from a report from the Young Foundation – a Left-leaning group who repeated a social study they had first conducted in Bethnal Green, East London, 50 years ago.

In 2006 they returned to the area and were taken aback by the changes. A social housing policy, introduced in the Seventies on the basis of ‘need’, had replaced the white working-class family structures with Bangladeshi families.

Instead of living close to their parents, white families had to move out to Essex, where social housing was available. I saw the effects of this government policy when I visited a primary school in the area.

On the wall hung school photos, past and present. There was one glaring difference.

All the children 50 years ago were white. All the children in the recent photo were not.

Where had the descendants of those white children gone, I wondered? In another country, one would presume some terrible ethnic cleansing had taken place. In the UK, it goes by another name – multiculturalism.

The Scapegoat and the Perpetrator

It is certainly not the immigrants themselves who are to blame – the majority have come here to work and are contributing to this country – it is the sheer numbers who have been allowed in thanks to New Labour’s border policy.

The Reason

What’s worse, as a Freedom of Information request recently uncovered, this policy was implemented in the hope that it would have a direct political benefit to Labour, since first-generation immigrants are more likely to vote with the Left.

In other words, Labour has put party interests above the very people it is meant to represent – the working-class voters, like Gillian Duffy, who were once the backbone of the Labour movement.

Yet not one of the party leaders has been prepared to raise immigration during the election campaign – and when the three party leaders tackled the issue during Thursday night’s TV debate, there was very little honesty.

Otherwise, all debate about this profoundly important issue has been stifled. In this political vacuum, radio phone-ins and online forums are one of the few outlets where open discussion on immigration is taking place.

Take the following contribution to a newspaper website discussion. ‘Why am I anxious about being English in England? Maybe it’s because I feel my culture no longer exists

‘It has been replaced by a concoction of foreign cultures, of which English is only a small part. Maybe it’s because it makes me feel my culture has no worth or place any more. Like it’s illegitimate. Someone has to do something.’

No doubt Gordon Brown would dismiss the author as a Right-wing bigot. In fact, it was left by a Guardian reader.

Plastic Politicians

The solution to our problems will not be forthcoming from the Perpetrators.  The Houses of Parliament is Operation HQ for the Detestables and so a clear out is needed of all the EU Stooge Parties.  An opposition cowered by baseless accusations of racism and xenophobia is either incompetent or complicit, either way, they are not fit for purpose.

Conservatives want Change.  Liberal Democrats want Change.  Labour think you’re all bigots for opposing Change.  Yet not one opposes the Eunification project, and until they do, the only Changes the EU Stooge Parties will allow will be EU approved ones.

Multiculturalism, Diversity and pacifism is the approved Change vigorously promoted by the European Commissioners.  Every bill, directive and treaty oozes with marxist-inspired politically-correct mumbo-jumbo that can exonerate or demonize on the basis of skin and thought.

I put my Nation first due to the simple fact that this is my home, not out of some false sense of superiority but because the demise of my beloved will mean an end to a large part of my heritage.  I do not fix up my neighbours home when my own is suffering the foolmanship of corrupted Parliamentarian tampering.  And I especially do not concern myself with the woes of the world when my own section of Earth is becoming smaller.

Patriotism and Nationalism are dirty words because the Internationalist Institutions who control Earth paint them so.

A thousand problems caused from Governmental Actions that will somehow justify more Governmental Intervention leading to more problems.

Isn’t life grand?





Beeb Archive | Little Lagos in Peckham

1 05 2010

Came across this by chance, which every good Briton reading should take note.  For if it can happen here, it can happen anywhere. And when they say happen, it will be with full intent.

The most surprising thing is the blatant encouragement by the BBC on behalf of the Government’s gerrymandering plans.

“Ooh, look.  Peckham is just like home, let’s go there”  Nigerian Bob will say.

Little Lagos in south London

BBC.  Last Updated: Tuesday, 25 January, 2005, 12:42 GMT

In the first of three pieces on his impressions of African immigrant communities in the UK, the former editor of the BBC’s Focus on Africa, Robin White, describes the Nigerian Yorubas of Peckham in south London.

The African immigrants I’ve come across in some two months’ of travelling in England, Wales and Scotland are hard-working, idealistic, and bright – a long way from the popular view portrayed by some in the UK.

And everyone I met that I asked said they wanted to go home. Maybe not today, maybe not tomorrow, but – when their countries are at peace, when they’ve made a bit of money, when democracy returns – they will return.

Here are some statistics: Africans in the UK now outnumber West Indians.

In 2003, 41% of all Asylum applications were from Africa. And that’s just the official figures.

Add to these all the illegal immigrants who somehow made it here from the continent, and it’s clear that Africans in the UK are a formidable force.

Yorubatown

It some towns, they’re very visible. Peckham in south London, for instance, looks very like Lagos. I used to live there, and over the past 10 years it has been transformed – into a Yoruba heartland.

Many of the shops are Yoruba owned and you can buy any Nigerian food you want – and it’s fresh from a farm near Lagos.

Nigerian churches and mosques flourish and compete for worshippers.

The successful churches run several Sunday sittings. Newcomers are welcomed with open arms and everyone is given an envelope with instructions on how to donate money for the church’s upkeep.

“Peckham,” I’m told by Yoruba taxi driver Olusola Dixon, “is where the living meet the dead.”

It is where Nigerians can bump into a distant Nigerian cousin who they never even knew was in the UK.

Yorubas, of a certain age, claim to love their culture and their language. And there is lots to love. The language is rich and there are 401 Yoruba deities to be worshipped.

Dying language

The trouble is that many London Yorubas have neglected to pass their traditions on to their children. A few insist on Yoruba being spoken at home, but many have given up the struggle of teaching Yoruba to unenthusiastic children, and English has become the family language.

True, they take their children home on holidays; true, a few surreptitiously slaughter chickens for the deities in their back yards. But basically Yoruba culture and language, as known in Nigeria, are on a steep decline.

Dubi Imevbore, an expert on Yoruba language, deeply regrets this.

He says that if a language dies, so does the human spirit. A people without a culture will lose their self respect, even go mad.

It doesn’t take long to discover that many Nigerians in London shouldn’t be here at all.

Some came on student visas and never went home. Some came on holiday to visit relatives and “missed” the plane back to Lagos. Some smuggled themselves in and have been in hiding ever since.

But being an illegal immigrant is not an easy life. Because they can’t work officially, they have to take the worst paid jobs at very unsociable hours and live in squalid flats – at the mercy of unscrupulous landlords.

Many would like to go home, but they’re ashamed to admit failure to their friends and families back in the motherland.

Effing marvelous.  Instead of lamenting the fact that a little piece of England is lost and has been replaced by an African colony, Dickie the Beeboid celebrates it.  I’m not racist but am certainly cultrist and most definitely territorial.

I mean for the love of God, how anyone can say a culture that endorses ritual sacrifice and ceremonial scarifications is equal to English culture is beyond me.  And those snort “look at our hooligans”, we have laws against that, Nigerians condone their barbarity.

And seeing as the more people who arrive in Peckham means more competition for the available resources and the positive discrimination steps taken to make NuBritons feel extra welcome, no-one can blame me for feeling a little left out.  Afterall, you wouldn’t like to see your neighbourhood slowly resemble a Little Lagos shanty town.

The highlight of this little BBC history is the mention of illegal immigrants who visited their family members yet failed to return home.  And I thought aiding and abetting in a criminal act was a deportation offence.  Not on Labour’s watch, that is for sure, and with the Liberal Democrats offering amnesty and a free ice cream cone to every NuBriton, will only worsen in Camberwell and Peckham.

What hurts the most is the lack of consideration given to MY people.  When did my family have a say in Peckham’s transformation from a mono-cultured community into a multi-faith and multi-tribal Ghetto?

I can understand the shortsightedness of our Idiotic Rulers.  Back in the Old Days, our Politicians could have several mistresses including multiple batardized children, be in league with the French and still get away with it.  Fast forward to today and the Houses of Swine are full of third-rate crooks who would have trouble getting away from a lollipop lady.  If we are to have the Devilish Buggers, at least let us have the best.

Like they don’t even try now.