UK | State-Sponsored Hate at the Gate

14 01 2011

By accident, I have come across some sort of government-sponsored guide for those wishing to partake the citizenship test and to be honest, I cannot believe that this is possible.  Talk about setting the scene for the NuBritons.  No wonder everywhere these migrants look they see racism, it seems to be our only defining feature according to these composers.

Word for word with my highlights, from the horse’s mouth.  Well, webshite:

Racism in Britain

Assessing how these immigrants have been welcomed in Britain since the 1950s is a complicated task. There was, and still is, a minority of hardcore racists, with policies based on the idea of ‘keeping Britain white’ and banning all immigration. Groups such as the British National Party (BNP) have remained on the extremist fringe of British politics. It is also true that black and Asian immigrants faced various degrees of hostility and racial prejudice in postwar Britain. Surveys conducted in the mid 1960s, for example, revealed that four out of five British people felt that ‘too many immigrants had been let into the country’.

This view has expressed itself in racist violence relatively rarely – the flashpoints in Britain during the past 50 years have largely been confined to poor areas where local white and black communities compete for scarce jobs and housing. But it has frequently been represented by more casual and insidious forms of racism. Anti-immigrant feelings have also been inflamed, both directly and indirectly, by agitation for tighter immigration controls – usually proposed when there is not an acute labour shortage.

If you don’t believe me, go here:  Postwar immigration.  It’s even called Brave New World for Christ’s sake!  How creepy is that?  Painting the Nationalist as xenophobic racists, for forget about the words British and Party, the authors have made their intentions clear, and in the same paragraph, give the very reason for it;  we never wanted them.  Then in the next, it is explicitly written that these racial flashpoints as the call them, are confined to the poor.

All those times imbeciles of the Leftarded Armies of Doom have had to ask me why I feel the way I do, THIS IS THE ANSWER.  We are never listened to.  Time and again we are ignored.  Survey after survey.  And if we ever dare march, the traitors and stooges amongst soon break it up from within.

Yet every media outlet regurgitates the same old bullcrap, as if their words will be enough to satisfy us natives.

Immigration is too high, say four in five Britons (Today)

Four out of five Britons want immigration capped, poll shows (Six months ago)

Could ‘Record four out of five jobs going to foreigners between May and June‘, published by the Telegraph four months ago have something to do with it?

Brave New World infuckingdeedy.

BACK-UP: Just in case the wording on the governmental-webshite ever changes in some type of Orwellian rewriting, have captured the entire screens.  Gov AGov BGov C.  Yes it is a little bit paranoid but as my father use to say, “shut the fuck up, the little green men can hear ya”, so you can never be too careful.

PERSONAL NOTE: Every Labourshite and Con’dDemselves that I ever have the pleasure of ranting at, be it with the technological prowess of fibre-optics or through the art of mime, I will make it my duty to remind them they are ignorant fools Satan would be proud of.





Leftarded Fallout | They cannot make up their mind

9 01 2011

With the media circus that has flared up around the issue of certain sections of society preying on defenceless children, the Left do not know where to look.  As Rod Liddle points out…

A bizarre report on the Asian child abuse court case on the BBC last night, which spent most of its time attempting to exonerate the Pakistani community as a whole, including clips of Pakistanis saying “actually, we probably shouldn’t abuse kiddies” and a white child abuse campaigner saying hey, look, it’s not Pakistanis who are the problem, etc etc.

This was broadcasting as a form of crowd control; undiluted propaganda. The fact is that some Pakistani men think it perfectly ok to abuse white girls and there are still gangs out there right now doing so. When Nick Griffin mentioned this fact, many years ago, they tried to prosecute him. When Radio Five covered the story five years ago they were eviscerated for it.

The praise the Left give towards Wikileaks verges on Sainthood, yet God damn those who expose any non-approved fact.  The indignation they display to the public to counter distasteful information stresses the concept of Controlled Media.  All this fallout amongst them shows just how vain and contradictory their ideals are.  And so, they are lashing out at anyone who might try to make political capital out of it, be racist, even the beloved Stooge of Labour, Straw Jack!

Most telling though is the one man you’d think the Controlled Media would be trying to hose down would be Nick Griffin, currently lending a hand to Derek Adams campaign in Oldham.  Instead, we have his views regurgitated, twisted and manipulated by those apologists and appeasers.

A recap of what has so upset the meeja darlings from the spectrum I’ve found are running with; Former home secretary says gangs of Pakistani men see young white girls as ‘easy meat’ (Independent);  Jack Straw, the former home secretary, has sparked a fierce row over his claim that some British Pakistani men regard white girls as “easy meat” for sexual abuse (Telegraph);  Labour MP Vaz says it is wrong for former home secretary to stereotype entire community over sexual assault case (GulfNews)

This is where I despair at all the criminologists.  The majority of crime victims, no matter what the crime, be it robbery or rape, are usually chosen for their perceived weakness and wrongs.  And the ones doing the choosing are by a large, opportunistic degenerates whose only resemblance to bravery happens when in a gang (or getting the Police or Armed Services to do it).

However, with rape and other sexual offences, it doesn’t help if the Koran advocates treating non-believers as fair-game.  Nor does if help with the constant promoted degradation of women by the Satanic Gods in the Meeja Industry (From Hollywood to Fleet Street).

It would be wrong to isolate this as an immigrant problem, yet the biggest immigration problem is that whenever they have a problem, it’ll be oppressive to point it out.

See where I’m going.  The problem is POLITICAL CORRECTNESS in a MULTICULTURAL environment.

They keep going around and around in circles asking is this the result of one thing when it is a combination of many aided by Cultural Marxism disguised as Political Correctness.

(((Click image to enlarge)))

Never forget what Harriet supports!

Never forget what Hodge was head of!

The enemy is not outside the gates no more.  They were imported here by the Enemy to divide us, making it easier to destroy Our Heritage and replace it with a New World Perversion.

Just say NO!





Law | Sex Case, Sex Case, Hang em, Hang em, Hang em!

7 01 2011

Leftarded reject from the happy farm Libby Brook, the Islamic and immigrant apologist working for the Guardian bogpaper has come to the defence of the “Muslim community”.  And all on the basis of what the British National Party have said.

Does she make a habit of scanning the words of the BNP and from there build her counter arguments?  If the BNP ran a story on preferring dogs, would she then defend cats!?!

She sprouts out some statistics from Engage (another subversive organisation) that nationwide, 80% of all perpetrators in the grisly crimes of sexual abuse are white.

Now, considering that not only Britons are white, for example, most of frigging Europe is, 80% is a rather generous figure.  Still, this is what she proclaims so let us say that the other 20% are just the non-white perverts.

Considering that the only reliable statistics on non-white Britons are a decade old with 7.9% of the national population are classed a different shade, it has been a decade so it has probably doubled to 16% at least.

So 16% of the population are committing more sex crimes per head meaning (and remember, fellow Europeans are included) that the remaining 84% of the population are committing LESS offences per head than those a shade darker than white.

Also consider these stories of injustice:

Margaret Hodge council thwarted paedophile case, says police chief (The Free Library.com, 2006 The Mail on Sunday)

Sex Attacker stays because of Human Rights (Express, Wednesday October 31,2007)

Fury as jailed East Lancashire sex attacker wins deportation fight (The Blackburn Citizen, Sunday 18th April 2010)

Anger as child sex attacker back in victim’s neighbourhood (The Telegraph and Argus, Monday 15th November 2010)

Why must we continue to put our kin at risk to foreign perverts, haven’t we enough of our own!?!  Is it so people the likes of Margaret and Libby can feel all warm and fuzzy!?!  If so, it isn’t good enough.  Not only should sex cases be strung up by the neck, but so too their enablers, their apologists and their appeasers.

This country’s governance makes me sick!





Rant | Colonisation, Immigration and Leftards

6 01 2011

The Leftarded Armies of Doom love to chastise us lowly Britons about our collective history, especially when it involves the British Empire.  Even more, they love to use it as an excuse to allow non-Britons full access to the Motherland.

Well, our Empire wasn’t due to a democratic mandate from the people so why should we suffer the consequence of the Nobles excesses?  Sure these rulers had one eye on the profitability such an adventure would bring but I assure you the other eye was clearly on protecting what they already had, namely Britain.

So let me point out the main reasoning behind England’s, and later Britain’s desire to forge an Empire.

First and foremost, England was in competition against not just her neighbours to the North and West but also those across the channel in Europe.

Before Christ was even a sparkle in God’s eyes (metaphorically speaking of course), the Romans invaded the lands of Albion.  After them it was a free for all and in 1066AD, we where finally conquered by William, King of Normandy (not France!).

So we never always had it our way and to suggest we have always been the oppressors is utter bullcrap.  We served our penance a millenia ago.

There we have the premise of the situation, a world with no Geneva Convention, no Human Rights and where subjugation was a better option than cooperation.  And throughout all this the common serf was shafted.  Those natives conquered later by Britain at least had 500 more odd years of freedom than my forbears!

Later on, better organised and better equipped, mainly to ensure those pesky kingdoms in the Roman Holy Empire didn’t overrun these lands once more, the English began the campaign to annex the Britannic Islands.  Remember, at this time, England was surrounded by possible threats, Scotland in the North, Wales and Ireland in the West and the rest of Europe to the South and East.

After some successes and failures, English domination became British domination and slowly our mastery of the sea came to the fore, allowing the Nobles to shift unwanted Britons across the globe, whether as colonists, soldiers or indentured servants (sending convicts abroad did happen but not on such a large-scale until the 1800s – hanging was cheaper and less chance of a mutiny at sea and thus another poxy pirate), the Anglo-Sphere was born.

Whipped and bloody, we crossed the oceans at great cost to personal life and limb and began sprinkling colonies wherever we found the least resistance.  In time, we constructed with our own sweat and blood villages which soon became towns, civilised (and sometimes terrorized) the natives, curtailing such backward practices such as cannibalism, human sacrifice and other stone age customs.

We tended the lands, manned the mines, transported exotic and complicated goods not just back to the Motherland but to every plot of land that was lucky enough to fly the Union flag.  Yes, the Empire was dealing opium and slaves but it was also our Empire that was the first to put a stop to both of these practices.

Of course it wasn’t always a bed of roses, yet even the best roses need manure.  Again, I cannot stress this enough, that if we had just sat back on our laurels and done nothing while our competitors conquered the world, we would not be here today.  For one, if we hadn’t given hell to the Spanish and French on the open seas in the Atlantic, Mediterranean, India and Pacific oceans, our beloved Islands would have stood no chance against invasion, yet we preserved and prospered.

Now,  enough of me explaining Britannia’s global effort, let us fast forward to the State-sponsored invasion of today.

Successive governments since 1945 have not only invited alien nationalities into the country, they have even laid out the transportation.  And even when warned by Sir Churchill first and later Sir Powell about the detrimental effects these mass importations of varying tribes would have on the homogenous homelands, our governments lied and lied.

Remember, when my forebears were sent abroad, they usually received a whack on the head from a press-gang and awoke seventy miles from shore on Her Majesty’s Ships.

Today, Britain sets up multiple expensive (to us) avenues for the legal migrant and perhaps a dozen so or more for the not so legal (Refugee Council bullcrap charity).

Remember, when my forebears were sent abroad, they usually had to draw their own maps, fight tooth and nail for a beachhead and then built their own homes, all by themselves.

Today, someone turns up on our shores with no food or shelter, and the government directs them to the dole and housing office and a few minutes later, without no effort from their part, they end up in with free vouchers and a roof over their heads.

Remember, when some of my forebears were told to fuck off out of the dominions they had conquered and built, the international community gave a round of applause.

Today, if I said the same thing to NuBritons, I would soon feel the full force of the law instigated by the very government whose only true duty is to defend the realm.

So you can take your multicultural and multiracial diversive crackpot ideal and shove it!





UK | The ingredients…

16 12 2010

and how to spoil the mix

Imagine a lump of dough.  Nice, white, fluffy dough.

Now, you bake that for a lil’ while, let it raise naturally while keeping a watchful eye, and presto, you have some nice biscuits.

But what if we add some more butter to mix?  Maybe a few raisins too?

Okay, we’ll put that in the oven for a lil’ while, and mmm, we have a nice buttery and raisin cake.

But what if we put loads of butter in and hundreds of thousands of the raisins?

Sure, why not, isn’t like I’m running out of imaginary dough.  There we go, we’ll pop that in the oven, and tell you what, imaginary gas is still imaginary expensive so we’ll put em on high and take it after a few minutes instead of the lil’ while.

Now, considering that the raisins have clogged together and the loose butter have demoralised the texture that once held it altogether.

In other words, what Britain’s immigration policy has been since 1948.





Ed West and Johnny Cruddas | A love story

6 12 2010

Miss West and Miss Cruddas share a romantic meal by the Thames at the world-renowned (and cheap compared to the Ritz) Harvey Nichols restaurant atop the London skyline, with fine own brand wines loosens the lips for a tantalising political broadside.  The result of this passionate affair is a quick person-promotion piece purporting to show Labour’s Old Skool MP John Cruddas as the second coming…  yet fails spectacularly.

The man who wants to save Labour’s soul

The Church fell out with Labour under Blair. Catholic MP Jon Cruddas speaks about why the people’s party lost its faith

Considering the above is in the little known Catholic Herald, Mr West sought to promote the article via his Telegraph blog, where after reading the following section, I could punch John on the nose;

“The far-Right party has always warned that Barking and Dagenham would end up with the same demographics as neighbouring Newham or Tower Hamlets.

Funnily enough, when I suggested this would happen to Cruddas, he replied simply: “I agree.” We were talking about the effects of people being driven out of inner London by housing benefits changes, but it’s hard to deny the biggest cause of this change will be Labour’s immigration policy.

Still, at least they won’t have to worry about the BNP in Barking and Dagenham for very long.”

Yeah, sure John and Ed, the benefit changes are to be blamed for the ever-increasing White Flight…  even though White Flight is 30 years older than the not-yet-implemented Benefit Reforms and was a reaction to mass importation of anything and everything alien moving next-door…   some people have their heads shoved so far up their own rear ends, I’m surprised they can’t smell the shite they proclaim.

And the last line from Mr West;  If the borough becomes another Tower Hamlets mini-Islamic Republic, of course he won’t, he’ll be swapped for a Muslim then parachuted into another Labour Donkey safe-zone.

The comment section is well worth the read if just to reassure yourself that you’re not the only one fuming at this fawning attempt.  In fact, I think I spent more time reading well-versed retorts than I did reading Ed’s bullcrapping articles.  And to think I used to look up to you Ed?  Whoring yourself out for a little extra coin…  times must be tough.

Kudos to a fellow patriot for the head’s up.





David Duke | How Zionists Divide and Conquer

3 12 2010

Great video showing Pot calling the Kettle black global political ideological warfare that we are sadly losing.  The message is clear.  Diversity for all…  except Israel…  mmm, wonder why that could be…

Forget racism, time for realism.   A people makes a nation, change the people, change the nation.