UK Jihad | War booty

13 01 2011

If you are told that you are the Chosen People, backed up by the lunatic ravings of a Satanic Prophet, you can be as sure as the nose on your face, that everyone outside of their holy group are treated as subhuman.

And so it is with the teachings of the Satanic Book of the Koran.  So it isn’t any wonder why they see our children as meat.

Yet I do not blame the invaders, I blame their enablers.  Be they subversives unhappy at the lack of revolutionary spirit amongst the native Britons or those apologists seeking warm and fuzzy feelings, not forgetting the deluded fools who wish to make amends for perceived injustice they had nowt to do with.  And I haven’t even mentioned the Corporate Powers that use immigration to keep wages low.

Never mind the victims in these schemes.  They are just collateral damage.  Acceptable losses in the eyes of the power merchants.

What if this was YOU though:

Or if this was YOUR child:

Every cultural group has it’s misfits, that is true.  The main difference between native nonces and Muslim ones is the former has no ideological basis for their behaviour, while the latter seem to have entire chapters proclaiming infidels are nothing more than cattle, to be used and abused in any which way they please.

That is the main difference.  And until our Government faces up to that fact, sadly, more of our children will fall prey to these animals.

You voted for this shit.  You sit in it.

Advertisements




Lawfare | Queer Laws and Consequences

7 12 2010

Isn’t it enough for queers to not have to go jail anymore???  Where will the equality stop???  Will the Pink Lobby not rest until everyone has had at least half a dozen perverted experiences???

From the Daily Wail comes a familiar tale.  State-recognised minority group offended by State-recognised majority group, offence is caused and so the offenders must pay.

Two queers book a hotel room.

On arrival, they are refused service due to their religious sensibilities.

Queers offended, call in the police and, presumably, want the couple arrested and persucuted for having the gall to offend them.

No crime was committed though and so it is referred to as a civil matter.

Not wanting the matter to rest, the queer couple decide they want recompense, and with the Equality and Human Rights Commission financing their bid, hence the Government with Our Purse, come hell or high water, will get it.

Meanwhile, Mr and Mrs Bull’s legal team will be financed by the Christian Institute, an organisation that I’m sure wouldn’t be eligible for Government nor Lottery handouts, considering it supports Christians.

Lawfare, doncha you love it?  How lawyers and barristers slave away for years in the Law Society crafting complex documents which can be interpreted more ways than an Iraqi Koran, documents that are made law by Old Pals in that other institution, Parliament.

’This case is about liberty of conscience. This guesthouse is Mr and Mrs Bull’s own home.

‘They have rights too, and they should not be forced to act against their sincerely held religious beliefs under their own roof.

‘Their guesthouse is not the only one in Cornwall, there is plenty of room for diversity of opinion.

‘This Christian couple are being put on trial for their beliefs. Equality laws are being used as a sword rather than a shield.’

Mike Judge, Christian Institute

 





Halal Meat | Finally, a need for PETA

28 09 2010

Eating meat is a luxury that once upon a time, many of us plebs could ill afford, hence the saying, bringing home the bacon.  Considering that malnutrition was the most common form of early death back in those dark days, never understood the reasoning behind the celebrity-studded People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals.

Yet now I have found a cause for the too-much-time-on-their-hands-so-need-to-do-something-charity-conscious celebrity to champion.

Halal and Kosher ritually slaughtered meat production and the imposition of it by stealth on the general population.

Although sadly, I doubt many of the celebrities in film or pop will wish to complain about their Bosses’ kosher meals.  Still, seeing how most Fashioned Workers are God hating gay blokes or dog ugly old hags, am sure this is a cause they would champion.

Of course we must respect religious practices but how far do we go?  If we continue to allow Halal and Kosher meat to circumnavigate our laws regarding the unnecessary pain and suffering caused to livestock, what happens when the African Voodoo Priest wishes to circumcise young girls nether regions?  How about a Polynesian family’s wish to carry on cannibal?  Okay, something less parodic, the cultural practices of certain ethnic minorities who are partial to a bit of swan?  Or the family practice of ‘keeping it in the family’ as some caravan dwelling families prove with their elongated foreheads?

Sure, whatever floats your boat should be an overriding principle in most matters, but not when they are literally cruel and inhumane and above all, give the corporate slaughter-house reason to do away with the cost of stunning the animals.

If we don’t maintain standards, is it any wonder they fall?  And anyhow, how come the Jewish and Muslim contingent just pray at the table like most other faiths?  (Rhetorical question, I already know, it’s cos they’re ‘special’)





HMP Prison | 5-Star Accomadation?

2 09 2010

A rehash of a previous posting from the beginning of the year, although altered to hopefully spruce up the Nationalist spirit ahead of the legal challenge ahead.

With the slight prospect of Her Majesty’s Prisons accommodating a few more Patriots, thought it best for them to scope at the following Prison.

Okay, Prison is Prison but if you have to go, demand the best.  We ain’t China in that respects thankfully.

Sadly I cannot for the life of me find the name and location, but I’m sure the legal team will be more than capable of finding that out.

No matter what they do to the messenger, the message is crystal clear;

We are no longer a Nation built on the rule of law, we are just an EU province oppressed by it as evidence from this written answer received from the Eurocrats:

19 May 2010

Joint answer given by Ms Vassiliou on behalf of the Commission

Written questions : E-2055/10 , E-2056/10

The Commission intends neither to impose cultural models on Member States nor to dilute national identities. On the contrary, as laid down in the Treaty, the Union contributes to the flowering of the cultures of the Member States, while respecting their national and regional diversity. It is in this perspective that the European Commission was instrumental in the adoption of the Unesco Convention on Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions in 2005. The Convention reaffirms the sovereign right of its parties to formulate and implement their cultural policies and to adopt measures to protect and promote the diversity of cultural expressions.

See how much room that leaves for interpretation?  Bet the lawyers drool over these multifaceted goals.






Hate | Is this subject to ‘equality’ too?

2 09 2010

Never understood this hate-crime malarkey.  For if I get stabbed by a white guy, I don’t think to myself that he has done it because he likes me.  So all this bullcrap legislation is pretty all-inclusive no matter what the spiteful motive was.  Having ‘extra punishments’ as a deterrent to crimes deemed ‘hateful’ does not make us equal before the law though, it in fact does the opposite.  And one of the most important, although trampled upon traditions our very system of Rule and Law is supposed to represent is the fact that everyone deserves the same protection under the law.

If I pound the living shit out of someone who is black, it would be deemed a hate-crime, yet if I beat the crap out of a whitey, even though I ain’t knocking three bells out of him because I like him, it is just deemed a normal crime.

Role reversal and say I was on the receiving end of the pain-train, it would be classed as a common assault no matter what the colour of my attacker.  Frankly, in a fair world, the sentencing should be the same for both.  no special treatment, no deferential treatment, just equal treatment.  It isn’t rocket science.

And I don’t even want to start on the ever-increasing encroachment upon our political-leanings.  For where do we stop?

Is a rabid hatred for anything reason for arrest?  Surely there has to be an unlawful attempt at criminality before an inquisition begins?

So a recap:  Like most violent crimes, 9 times out of 10, it is done because you hate someone, can’t imagine people beating up people they like.  So making ‘examples’ sort of makes a mockery out of equality.  Some would say it sort of gives the green light for the other to suffer.

I sometimes think that the Law Society push for all these pointless laws just to keep busy.  Back in the early days of justice, you saw a judge within the hour, evidence heard, verdict given and if punishment was deemed necessary was quick and swift.  Now the Judge, Barristers and Solicitors have put so many considerations and references upon certain crimes that it takes a small lifetime to conduct proceedings.

Worse than pimps!  These Lawturds get paid to screw man, woman, child and no doubt thin frikking air.  Instead of treating everyone equal under the law, they wish to tailor it to suit their own egomaniacal (and economic) needs.  Bloody Masons I blame.  I wouldn’t mind so much if I could dip my finger in the pie once in a while.

Law should be kept as simple to understand as possible.  Our current set of ever-increasing Statutes and EU-approved Directives leave too much room for interpretation.





Lawfare | The wolves at the door

1 09 2010

The Top Dogs at the BNP should start taking law courses considering the amount of time they have to pay for a poxy defence.  And it must be a poxy defence for this should have been fought, and won, eons ago.  For the love of God, these are mickey-mouse laws that were brought in causing these mickey-mouse charges, and to top it all off, was instigated by a mickey-mouse quango.  Well, you see we’re already on a par with frikking Walt Disney!

Whether you disagree with the Nationalist ideals completely holding a deep belief that all cultures, creeds and people’s are equal in every shade and shape, the ongoing battle against the British National Party is an abuse of the Rule of Law.

Considering that it is quite alright for organisations to actively fight for one side of the argument, damn, even get taxpayer-financed, hence government-approved help, yet the opposing side of the argument is deemed inappropriate at best, persecuted at worst.

British Refugee Council, Operation Black Vote, Alcohol Concern and that anti-smoking one ASH.  All paid for out of your money who then prance around pretending they actually give a shit, or worse, doing a good job increasing the numbers of passport-seekers, racial gerrymandering, arguing for more taxation while one organisation is just waiting for the green light for a bonfire to end the smokers plight.

Yet if you dare say you wish to speak for the English, Scots, Irish and Welsh, you are to feel the full force of the law on you.

Click image to enlarge

Those facing the judge should proclaim their English Common Law Rights and state that this is an abuse of power.  The Almighty and All Powerful State trying to dictate the rules of an organisation.  First it was the membership that wanted changed, now they wish to change the wording of the constitution (sic)!  Where will it end?

Of course, I’m frothing at the mouth with what the lost of our once great system of Checks and Balances.  Sure it wasn’t perfect then but at least people rose up the ranks whereas now, it’s about bringing everything down to the lowest possible denominator.  Nowadays, our polichickens could get caught badgering a sheep and keep their job.  No standards whatsoever.

And if the Rich and Famous misbehave, given the herd mentality of people on the whole, is it any wonder our world is so contradictory?

My only experience of Johnny Law is running away from it so perhaps I am not the best person in the world to offer legal advice, although one golden rule is always seek a trial by jury.  Especially when faced with such bogus charges.

Surely a simple explanation the precedent this would set for EVERYONE would be enough to find you not guilty on all charges.

And play your cards right and it could open the door for a counter-claim against Her Majesty’s Government’s anti-British quango with the ironic name of the Equality and Human Rights Commission.

If worse comes to the worse, can I suggest legging it and claiming EU-loony law immunity?

Also, if you haven’t yet, you have got to find out how much this has cost the EHRC.  Remember, it is the taxpayer’s creditcard being used.  Surely in these times of ‘tgihtening our belts’, spending X amount of £££ on a pointless persucution, mmm…

Good luck BNP and get back to winning hearts and minds (keeping em too would be nice too)





BNP | Inward Struggles

31 08 2010

The following is my own thoughts so feel free to take it with a healthy pinch of salt.

While Britain burns, the BNP decides to show everyone their dirty washing.  I won’t go into the details for I can’t even Adam and Eve the antics suggested.  All I will say on the bother is…

For all the progress made, it seems that the Leadership contest has turned into a One Man Show, members are resigning/expelled (depending on source) along with alleged scenes involving X-rated action.

The breakdown is probably due to a whole host of factors.  One could be that with the British National Party hierarchy wanting to become a Political Force, they have actually morphed into a mini-version of the opposing Main Political Parties, and what I mean by that, is never trusting their members.  Another could be those who believe they deserve more and have been overlooked, jealously is a bitch and I know that from personal experience.

I fear the only way forward for the British National Party is a complete reshape of the organisation.  And that is what it should be, an organisation, not some political pawn party available to the highest bidder.

Instead of trying to control a vast machine, organise it to be self-sufficient little cells independent of eachother.  Sure there is a chance of infiltration but so long as some form of ‘Standardisation’ is agreed, those that deviant can be looked upon as a cell instead of representing the whole body.

All forms of discriminatory behaviour should be kept to a minimum, white, black or martian, so long as the individual supports the central theme of British Nationalism, which is freedom from tyranny and a return to the checks and balances that once kept our power cartels in check.

Main reason I’ve never joined any political wing is the demand for obedience to certain individuals, be them money men or whips, thereby negating your very presence in every event.  Done with the best intentions but so easily corrupted when idols are promoted, for the message becomes secondary to the man, and whereas men are mortal, ideas can transcend mere time.

So, to my compatriots in the British National Party and also the many other Nationalist causes, yes, even the outright supremacy ones, refine the message, not the men.  This is not to say that the messengers are not important and should turn up in trrackies and trainers, but the message and not the man is more important.

Also, a little take on the current governmental quango-inspired witch trial threatened by Her Royal Majesty’s Equality and Human Rights Commission.  Considering that bankruptcy could be the result of this political persecution along with possible jail-time for the Chairman, this could provide the perfect opportunity for regrouping and catapulting the BNP into political stardom.  “How is that possible?” I hear you murmur.

Well, worse case scenario is that the EHRC wins the case outright, bankrupting the party and jailing Nick Griffin.

This means that a fresh new approach can be taken.  Nationalists then form the British Nationalist Party, a loose-fitting organisation with set principles of promoting UK Nationalist interests, such as leaving the EUSSR and an English Parliament to equalize the Home Nations to name but two.

Next, considering that locking up people for their political beliefs on the grounds of a mickey-mouse law is something the Communist Party of China are fond of, Mr Nick Griffin could become a living martyr.  Simply put, this would be a classic case of political persecution that could be appealed to the highest courts in the world, just imagine the bad publicity the British Government would receive over this.

Perhaps then there won’t be no need for a violent ANC/IRA inspired campaign of terror to ascertain Our Birthrights.